Awhile back, a coworker and I had a brief discussion regarding the construction of cell phones. It started as he was telling of a problem he was having with his cell phone and ended with both of us sharing stories of previous cell phones being much more durable than our current models.

My first cell phone was a Nokia 5160. If you’re not familiar with this model, it was a “candy bar” style phone produced in the mid to late 1990s. As was the common thing to do back then, I kept it in a leather case with belt-clip. It was a great phone in that it worked good and was quite durable.

That phone got dropped, kicked, thrown, and abused in more ways that I can count but always continued to work. The only problem that ever evolved with that phone was the fact that after using it for 2 or 3 years, the battery life began to significantly decrease. At which time I renewed my contract with my cell phone company and got a new phone.

Since that time, I have had Motorola flip phones. First, a V60, then a V710 followed by an E815 and now currently a V9m. While all of these phones have worked quite well for me and I am a fan of the Motorolas, they don’t make phones as durable as they used to.

This isn’t something I’ve noticed with just the Motorola brand, but also several reports from people using all variety of different brands and models of phones. Many of the more common reports, as well as things that I have experienced, include parts breaking off (antennas, the flip part, battery covers, etc), screens that quit working properly, and a variety of other issues.

It seems to me that perhaps there is a bit of planned obsolescence by the cell phone makers. Heck, it’s simple enough for people to get a new phone every year or two through their service provider and always have the newest features on their phone and everyone should be happy right? By this thinking, it’s understandable that the phone be made a little crappier (cheaper) and less durable (it only has to last two years right) and thus the reason that the current cell phones are not as well-built as their ancestors.

However, just because a person can get a new phone every two years doesn’t mean they are going to want to. Many people (myself included) grow attached to their phone and unless there is some new feature that they want, would rather keep their current phone. This is made difficult if their phone is breaking because it wasn’t built to last. Also, because the phones are built to only last a limited amount of time, they are much more susceptible to breaking.

It is this cheaper construction and the fact that the phones are only intended to last a limited amount of time that I feel is the cause for the increase in broken cell phones. Why can’t they build them to last and be more durable like the older ones were. Yes, the designs are much sleeker now and the features are awesome, but what good is all that if the phone is broken and/or doesn’t work.

How about you? Do you have any similar experiences? Does it seem like phones do not stand up to as much abuse as they used to or do they just get abused that much more? Subscribe to my feed, then share your thoughts in the comments below.