Fri 6 Jul 2007
From time to time, John Chow will reference the “Gun and Butter Theory” in one of his blog posts. I do not know if this theory is of his own creation or if he found it somewhere, but I do know that it makes pretty good sense.
The basis of the theory is that we can buy two things with our money: guns or butter. The difference between the two is that guns appreciate while butter depreciates. The conclusion from this then is that we should all focus on acquiring guns, because guns make more guns, while butter just melts.
I really like this theory and think everyone should consider it every time that they make a purchase. The best guns make you money without you having to part with them and the second best go up in value so that when you get rid of them you have more than you did before you got them. Everything else (almost everything that a person owns) would fall under the category of butter. Everyone’s goal should be to have lots and lots of guns. Eventually, once you get enough guns, you can have all the butter you want.
RSS feed
| Trackback URI
|
Send To A Friend
RSS Feed

[…] While this is fine and a person who makes a decent amount of money is entitled to a few nicer things and a few toys, the majority of the people get too much butter and forget to buy guns. It’s OK to get a little bit of butter, but when you have the extra income, you would be much better off investing/saving it and/or paying off whatever debts you may have. […]